Salt la conținut

State of HTML 2025

Accesibilitate

Crearea unor site-uri și aplicații accesibilte tuturor.

We're highlighting interesting features or libraries we think you should know about.

Feature Highlight: <search>

The <search> element is one of those easy wins that take very little effort to add to your list of best practices. Step 1: use it to denote any search field in your apps. Step 2: well that's it really!

And now that it's supported in all four major browsers, there's really no reason not to be using it.

Baseline: Newly Available

Learn more

Useful Resources

Funcționalități de accesibilitate

Landmark elements (<main>, <nav>, etc.) aren't very new or exciting but they remain a foundation of web accessibility.

Group by:

Sort by:

1
Accesibilitate
Landmark elements
96.7%
4,383
2
Accesibilitate
88.2%
8%
4,381
3
Accesibilitate
29.3%
29.1%
41.2%
4,377
4
Accesibilitate
13%
22.5%
64.3%
4,378

Experience

  • <span aria-hidden="true">🤓</span> Am folosit: Respondents who have used an item.
  • <span aria-hidden="true">👀</span> Am auzit despre: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
  • <span aria-hidden="true">🤷</span> N-am auzit niciodată despre asta: Respondents who have never heard about an item.

Sentiment

  • Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
  • Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
  • Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
“Used” average:57%
“Positive” average:37%
“Negative” average:2%

Alte tehnici de accesibilitate

While things like alt text or proper heading hierarchy have become second nature to most front-end developers, newer tools like the prefers- set of media queries have yet to truly become mainstream.
Ce alte tehnici sunt parte din strategia ta obișnuită de accesibilitate?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
Text alt descriptiv
3,647
02
Ierarhia informației
3,452
03
Form Control Labels
3,331
04
Text link relevant
+1
2,827
05
Contrast suficient
+1
2,778
06
Contur de focus vizibil
+1
2,725
07
Navigare intuitivă cu ajutorul tastaturii
-3
2,454
08
<fieldset> și <legend>
+2
2,250
09
Nu doar pointer
2,194
10
Nu doar culoare
-2
2,192
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
4,124
66%
10

Dizabilități ale utilizatorului

It's nice to see that beyond accounting for users with vision impairments, more developers are also taking atypical color vision and mobility impairments into account compared to last year.
Ce tipuri de dizabilități iei în calcul atunci când creezi website-uri?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1
Vedere scăzută
2,724
2
Vedere atipică a culorilor
2,163
3
Deficiențe locomotorii
1,387
4
Tulburări vestibulare
920
5
Deficiențe de auz
687
6
Deficiențe cognitive
677
7
🚫 Niciuna
665
8
Alte deficiențe cognitive
600
9
Alte răspunsuri
52
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
3,727
60%
10

Screen Readere

Once again, easily accessible tools like VoiceOver or the Chrome DevTools win over more specialized options. Although many developers still don't use screen readers of any kind (also note that 39% of survey respondents skipped the question altogether).
Ce screen readere folosești pentru testarea accesibilității?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
VoiceOver
+1
1,376
02
🚫 Niciuna
1,358
03
Chrome DevTools
-1
1,306
04
NVDA
742
05
JAWS
414
06
WAVE
366
07
TalkBack
216
08
Narrator
199
09
Orca
137
10
Chromevox
88
11
Firefox Accessibility Inspector
12
Alte răspunsuri
51
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
3,784
61%
10

Instrumente pentru accesibilitate

Browser devtools have seen a huge jump in usage compared to last year's results, seeing them overtake Lighthouse to become the lead accessibility testing tool.
Ce instrumente folosești pentru testarea accesbilității?
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
Browser Devtools
+1
2,259
02
Lighthouse
-1
1,983
03
Axe
1,145
04
Firefox Accessibility Inspector
1,033
05
🚫 Niciuna
-1
717
06
WAVE
+1
648
07
-1
544
08
Accessibility Insights
523
09
Pa11y
+1
188
10
Arc
-1
167
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
3,860
62%
10

Puncte slabe legate de accesibilitate

While there are technical gaps when it comes to accessibility (e.g. cross-root ARIA), a recurring theme whenever we ask about it is that the main pain points are around the humans involved with issues around workplace priorities, education, and cognitive overhead topping the list.
Care sunt cele mai slabe puncte legate de accesbilitate?
Multiple
Top pain point topics overall.

View:

Items that are not one of “limitations”
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
01
Education
3
02
workplace
1
03
Cognitive overload
2
04
Debugging
1
05
Environments & Consumers
06
Screen reader issues
2
07
ARIA
1
08
Browser support
1
09
Low priority
-7
10
Tooling
2
11
Excessive complexity
-2
12
Keyboard navigation
13
Standards & Specs
1
14
Focus management
-3
15
16
Missing elements
17
Ecosystem issues
18
Content
1
19
Accessible visual design
20
Reliance on JavaScript
21
Access to screen readers
+3
22
Component-Based Architecture
23
Invalid/Spam
24
CSS Integration
25
26
Alte răspunsuri
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% din respondenții la întrebare
606
10%
25
5

Resurse recomandate

Website Accessibility, v3
Jon Kuperman
Bloomberg

Website Accessibility, v3

Build content for everyone and become your company's accessibility expert! Learn the importance of semantic HTML and alt text for ensuring screen readers can navigate your site.
Mulțumim partenerilor noștri pentru susținere! Află mai multe.